ideaorange *IDEAorange

Archive
Tag "energy"

Am I wast­ing energy?

I have to say that Mil­ton didn’t really enlighten me on this one. When meet­ing with prospec­tive clients it’s not about being excited about the project — it’s about being excited to work with the client.

There are lot’s of excit­ing projects out there, many more than you think. Most of them will die because the peo­ple work­ing on them sucked the life out of them.

3
SOME PEOPLE ARE TOXIC AVOID THEM.
This is a sub­text of num­ber one. There was in the six­ties a man named Fritz Perls who was a gestalt ther­a­pist. Gestalt ther­apy derives from art his­tory, it pro­poses you must under­stand the ‘whole’ before you can under­stand the details. What you have to look at is the entire cul­ture, the entire fam­ily and com­mu­nity and so on. Perls pro­posed that in all rela­tion­ships peo­ple could be either toxic or nour­ish­ing towards one another. It is not nec­es­sar­ily true that the same per­son will be toxic or nour­ish­ing in every rela­tion­ship, but the com­bi­na­tion of any two peo­ple in a rela­tion­ship pro­duces toxic or nour­ish­ing con­se­quences. And the impor­tant thing that I can tell you is that there is a test to deter­mine whether some­one is toxic or nour­ish­ing in your rela­tion­ship with them. Here is the test: You have spent some time with this per­son, either you have a drink or go for din­ner or you go to a ball game. It doesn’t mat­ter very much but at the end of that time you observe whether you are more ener­gised or less ener­gised. Whether you are tired or whether you are exhil­a­rated. If you are more tired then you have been poi­soned. If you have more energy you have been nour­ished. The test is almost infal­li­ble and I sug­gest that you use it for the rest of your life.

Read More

Why would a com­pany office have it’s ther­mo­stat set to 68°? That was our first thought when read­ing this news blurb. Sixty-eight degrees is freez­ing in an office envi­ron­ment where almost every­one sits at work­sta­tions or in cubi­cles all day. What sense does this make?

Chilly Offices Limit Pro­duc­tiv­ity
Rais­ing the tem­per­a­ture of an insur­ance company’s offices from 68 degrees to 77 degrees Fahren­heit (20 to 25 C) reduced typ­ing errors by 44% and boosted typ­ing out­put by 150%, accord­ing to a month­long study by Alan Hedge of Cor­nell. The higher, more com­fort­able tem­per­a­ture resulted in a sav­ings for the employer of about $2 per worker per hour, Hedge says.

Maybe this study was to jus­tify the chang­ing of ther­mostats to weigh the sav­ings in energy vs. productivity?

When every­one is talk­ing green, sus­tain­able and smart energy use where are the smarts? Why is it 90+ degrees out­side and inside staff are wear­ing sweaters? Guess we needed a Cor­nell study to jus­tify cost savings/productivity.
read the arti­cle here >

Read More

halogenabulb

Despite a decade of cam­paigns by the gov­ern­ment and util­i­ties to per­suade peo­ple to switch to energy-saving com­pact flu­o­res­cents, incan­des­cent bulbs still occupy an esti­mated 90 per­cent of house­hold sock­ets in the United States. Aside from the aes­thetic and prac­ti­cal objec­tions to flu­o­res­cents, old-style incan­des­cents have the advan­tage of being remark­ably cheap. - nytimes

I have been stock­ing up incan­des­cent bulbs for when we move into the dreaded light of CFL’s, com­pact flu­o­res­cent light bulbs, and don’t turn back. Luck­ily the incan­des­cent indus­try has responded to the leg­is­la­tion that will make the beloved cheap light­bulb a thing of the past. The bulb won’t be as cheap but it will address all the other rea­sons why CFL’s haven’t taken hold.

I hate the light from CFL’s. The wave­length of the light gives me headaches. The light doesn’t have the warmth of home that we all have grown to love. The mer­cury too is an issue… with the many bulbs that the US con­sumes the waste does become an issue espe­cially in landfills.

Let’s face it. We need a bet­ter build than the CFL. The CFL is good for stair­wells and fire exits but it just isn’t a home use bulb. LED’s are a bet­ter value for any­thing that has to burn 24/7. It’s amaz­ing how an indus­try can respond to the forces of leg­is­la­tion to inves­ti­gate and inno­vate rather than give up and retool to make some­thing like the CFL. Seems we already have some­thing better.

Now to make it more afford­able for everyone.


Incan­des­cent Bulbs Return to the Cut­ting Edge : nytimes

Read More

Bad Behavior has blocked 236 access attempts in the last 7 days.