ideaorange *IDEAorange

Archive
June, 2010 Monthly archive

from the video description:

Video fea­tur­ing from IBM: Mike Wing, Andy Stanford-Clark and John Tolva.

Over the past cen­tury but accel­er­at­ing over the past cou­ple of decades, we have seen the emer­gence of a kind of global data field. The planet itself — nat­ural sys­tems, human sys­tems, phys­i­cal objects — have always gen­er­ated an enor­mous amount of data, but we didn’t used to be able to hear it, to see it, to cap­ture it. Now we can because all of this stuff is now instru­mented. And its all inter­con­nected, so now we can actu­ally have access to it. So, in effect, the planet has grown a cen­tral ner­vous system.

Look at that com­plex set of rela­tion­ships among all of these com­plex sys­tems. If we can actu­ally begin to see the pat­terns in the data, then we have a much bet­ter chance of get­ting our arms around this. That’s where soci­eties become more effi­cient, that’s where more inno­va­tion is sparked.

When we talk about a smarter planet, you can say that it has two dimen­sions. One is to be more effi­cient, be less destruc­tive, to con­nect dif­fer­ent aspects of life which do affect each other in more con­science and delib­er­ate and intel­li­gent ways. But the other is also to gen­er­ate fun­da­men­tally new insights, new activ­ity, new forms of social rela­tions. So you could look at the planet as an infor­ma­tion, cre­ation and trans­mis­sion sys­tem, and the uni­verse was hear­ing its infor­ma­tion but we weren’t. But increas­ingly now we can, early days, baby steps days, but we can actu­ally begin to hear the planet talk­ing to us.

Music by Lee Feld­man: http://www.leefeldman.com/

Read More

Stephen Fry gets what good design is all about – ease of use, need, promise, and dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion in the mar­ket­place. There were mp3 play­ers before the iPod. There were smart­phones before the iPhone. There were tablet pc’s before the iPad. But an over­whelm­ing num­ber of peo­ple buy Apple prod­ucts. They buy them because Apple deliv­ers on a promise.

That promise is the ease of use and per­for­mance of Apple’s prod­ucts. The inte­gra­tion of Apple’s soft­ware and hard­ware have made them unstop­pable dispite the deep pocket so called com­peti­tors in the mar­ket­place.  The launch of iPhone 4 and the newly renamed iOS plat­form on which the iPhone and iPad cur­rently run pro­pels Apple ahead of it’s com­petion again.

The iPhone is more than fea­tures or hard­ware specs. They have no head to head competitor.

Read More

The Rural Design Collective

The Rural Design Col­lec­tive cur­rently has a project on Kick­starter. Be a design activist and a good cit­i­zen. Sup­port the work they do. It’s good design of the best kind.
Read More

In some unsci­en­tific polling we’ve got­ten a resound­ing pos­i­tive response to this Apple spot that hits the emo­tion meter right at the heart. Apple knows it’s not the hard­ware that dif­fer­en­ti­ates a prod­uct. What do you think?

Read More

Lis­ten for yourself.

In case you don’t hap­pen to know about D, just wanted to post this up for you. This is the full inter­view about a week before Apple’s WWDC.

Read More

Found this vid on Fast Com­pany. Totally amaz­ing. Another tech­no­log­i­cal leap for com­pact, mobile devices. The thin­ner the dis­play envi­ron­ment the thin­ner the device. This even illus­trates the pos­si­bil­ity of unrolling a dis­play which has been tucked away. It’s not prime­time yet, but… Pretty excit­ing stuff.

from Fast Company:

The tech­nol­ogy hinges on a new kind of organic thin-film tran­sis­tor (OTFT) based on a new semi­con­duct­ing mate­r­ial that has eight times the cur­rent mod­u­la­tion rate of exist­ing OTFTs. This makes the dis­play pow­er­ful, but there’s at least one more clever trick–instead of rely­ing on dri­ving elec­tron­ics based on con­ven­tional solid chips in their famil­iar lit­tle black plas­tic pack­ages, Sony’s built all the dis­play dri­ver tech out of OTFTs them­selves, and inte­grated them into the actual panel the dis­play itself is made on. This is crafted from a super-thin (20 micron-thick) sub­strate, mak­ing it flex­i­ble enough to be repeat­edly rolled around a tube of diam­e­ter of just 4mm, as well as being stretched.

Read More

Mas­simo Vignelli, Sub­way Map, heaven.

Next month, the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Trans­porta­tion Author­ity will unveil a resized, recol­ored and what they say is a sim­pli­fied edi­tion of the well-known map, its first over­haul in more than a decade. One thing we can say for cer­tain is that the new map isn’t in any­way simplified.

1. A sub­way map isn’t like a road map.

2. Putting type on a diag­o­nal is just plain dumb.

3. A map is not a fash­ion statement.

A sub­way map is a sys­tem­atic rep­re­sen­ta­tion of a trans­porta­tion sys­tem. We don’t need topog­ra­phy or geog­ra­phy. Although sub­way trains have dri­vers they don’t make deci­sions where to go. As rid­ers we only need to know where to get onwhere we are and where to get off - where we want to go.  As long as the stops are in the proper order the map works.

A sub­way is a sys­tem and a sys­tem­atic approach is the appro­pri­ate solu­tion. We don’t need land­marks; we’re underground!

The only crit­i­cism that we ever had of the Vignelli map was show­ing any geog­ra­phy at all. Main­tain­ing an abstract space would have sup­ported the map as a sys­tem. Strangely enough Mas­simo Vignelli admits to this mis­take in the clip we’ve embedded.

We’ve added images and links to Paris, Lon­don, Berlin, and Tokyo.

Oh, the approach allows for easy translation.

Berlin Sub­way map
more infor­ma­tion at Wikipedia >

Paris sub­way map
more infor­ma­tion at Wikipedia >


Lon­don sub­way map:
more infor­ma­tion at Wikipedia >


video with Mas­simo Vignelli:

story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/28/nyregion/28map.html

graphic:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/27/nyregion/new-ny-subway-map.html

More about design­ing maps and infor­ma­tion graph­ics:
Edward Tufte’s books >

Read More

Bad Behavior has blocked 236 access attempts in the last 7 days.